AI Governance & Compliance
Regulatory analysis for companies building and deploying AI systems.
Why this collection exists
Your company ships an AI-powered product to enterprise customers across multiple states. Colorado's AI Act takes effect in February 2026. Illinois already regulates AI in hiring. The EU AI Act applies to any system reaching European users. Federal agencies are filing enforcement actions under existing consumer protection authority, and the DOJ has a new task force focused on AI-related fraud and discrimination.
There is no single federal AI law. Instead, there are overlapping state statutes, federal agency guidance documents, and international frameworks that may or may not apply to your product depending on its use case, data inputs, and deployment context. Compliance means tracking multiple regulatory tracks simultaneously.
This collection covers the regulatory developments that matter most for companies building and deploying AI systems in the United States. Each article breaks down a specific rule, enforcement action, or compliance requirement with concrete steps you can take now.
Practice and industry pages
7 articles
-
NIST Wants to Regulate AI Agents: A 5-Point Readiness Checklist
NIST launched the AI Agent Standards Initiative targeting autonomous AI systems. Two comment periods are open now. Here's a 5-point checklist to prepare.
-
Your AI Hiring Tool Might Be an Unlicensed Credit Bureau: The Lawsuits That Could Change How You Recruit
A new FCRA lawsuit against Eightfold AI, a collective action against Workday, and two state laws now in effect are creating real liability for any company using AI in hiring. Here's what to do about it.
-
The DOJ Built a Task Force to Sue States Over AI Laws. Here's Where the Fight Actually Stands.
The DOJ AI Litigation Task Force intervened in one Colorado lawsuit in April 2026 and has not independently sued California, Texas, or Illinois as of June 2026. This article explains what the Task Force has actually done, why an executive order cannot preempt state law, and what founders and operators should do while the federal-state fight plays out.
-
The AI Enforcement Paradox: Why Federal Retreat Doesn't Mean You're Safe
The FTC just reversed its Rytr enforcement order while 42 state attorneys general demand AI safety measures by January 16. Here's how to build a compliance program that works under both regimes.
-
The 2026 Compliance Playbook: How to Turn New Regulations into Competitive Advantage
Tomorrow, a wave of new regulations takes effect. California's AI rules. Three new state privacy laws. Major tax code changes. Here's your roadmap to get ahead while competitors figure out what hit them.
-
Your Board Will Ask About AI Risk in 2026. Here's How to Have a Good Answer.
The FTC fined Cleo AI $17 million. Insurers are adding AI exclusions to liability policies. Here's how to build a defensible AI governance program before your next board meeting.
-
The AI Compliance Collision: How the White House's Preemption Order Creates Legal Uncertainty for Multi-State Enterprises
The White House just threw a wrench into every multi-state AI compliance program. Here's what enterprises need to know about the December 11 executive order and how to navigate the uncertainty.
Talk through how these developments affect your company.
Send a short note describing what you are working on. The founding attorney reviews each inquiry personally.